Roger Federer stays king of the Grand Slam, however Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal are able to overtake him

Twelve years in the past, and it doesn’t rejuvenate us, for enjoyable we established a rating on the dimensions of the historical past of Grand Slam tournaments. With a easy rule. Contemplating that “week two” refers to and is a break in a serious event, we solely awarded every participant factors from the 1/8 finals in keeping with the next scale:

  • 1 level for failure in Spherical 16
  • 2 factors for a loss within the quarter-finals
  • 4 factors for dropping within the semi-final
  • 6 factors for dropping the ultimate
  • 10 factors for the ultimate victory

It was after the Australian Open 2010, gained by Roger Federer, that we printed this rating for the primary time. At the moment, the Swiss took the lead with 220 factors, forward of Jimmy Connors (208), Pete Sampras (203), Ivan Lendl (202) and Roy Emerson (201). Rafael Nadal scored 93 factors then. He did not even make it to the highest 25 within the desk. Novak Djokovic had 46 factors on the numerator. It is laborious to flirt with the historic High 50.


“The Queen” Serena goes there with her tribute: “You inspired millions of people, including me”


2010: Roger Federer in Melbourne. He simply gained his sixteenth Grand Slam title on the age of 28. He’s then alone on this planet within the face of historical past.

Supply: Getty Photographs

Rating after the Australian Open 2010

1. Roger Federer – 220 factors
2. Jimmy Connors – 208 factors
3. Pete Sampras – 203 factors
4. Ivan Lendl – 202 factors
5. Roy Emerson – 201 factors
6. Andre Agassi – 192 factors
7. Ken Rosewall – 179 factors
8. Rod Laver – 162 factors
9. Bjorn Borg – 156 factors
10. Invoice Tilden – 152 factors
26. Rafael Nadal – 93 factors
54. Novak Djokovic – 46 factors

We up to date this rating for the primary time 6 years and 24 Grand Slam tournaments later. The hierarchy has developed significantly, giving a full measure of the affect of the “Massive Three” on tennis historical past. Roger Federer was nonetheless untouchable and had simply crossed the 300 level mark to succeed in the Australian Open semi-finals. Then he dug unbelievable gaps. If we had saved such a rating in late 2002 after Pete Sampras retired, the primary 4 would have been in a handkerchief: 208 factors for Connors, 203 for Sampras, 202 for Lendl, 201 for Emerson. In early 2016, Federer positioned this trio on a couple of hundred factors.

However the revolution did not finish there. Because of his distinctive profession in Grand Slam from the start of 2010, Novak Djokovic grew to become the brand new runner-up of the king. His latest victory in Melbourne scored simply 212 factors, out of the blue overtaking Lendl, Sampress and Connors. Roger Federer, Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal already occupied three of the highest 4 locations. As a placing testimony to what the three tenors have achieved over the nice decade.

5’30 ” of pure happiness: when Federer delights the world over

Rating after the Australian Open 2016

1. Roger Federer – 302 factors
2. Novak Djokovic – 212 factors
3. Jimmy Connors – 208 factors
4. Rafael Nadal – 204 factors
5. Pete Sampras – 203 factors
6. Ivan Lendl – 202 factors
7. Roy Emerson – 201 factors
8. Andre Agassi – 192 factors
9. Ken Rosewall – 179 factors
10. Rod Laver – 162 factors

We now have six and a half years and 26 main tournaments later. A interval a lot much less favorable for Roger Federer, regardless of his renewed flame in 2017-2018. Nonetheless, Basel stays the chief of this rating, however greater than ever, Novak Djokovic’s breath is on his neck. Federer has not too long ago added 57 factors to his counter, towards 133 for the Serbian champion who’s due to this fact solely 14 lengths. If he have been in a position to play within the Australian Open and US Open this 12 months, maybe Djoker would have already got overtaken Federer, who for his half may have his counter locked without end after his retirement announcement on Thursday.

Novak Djokovic, winner of the final 4 editions of Wimbledon.

Supply: Getty Photographs

The Massive Three has now monopolized your entire podium and crushed the competitors on a historical past scale. By scoring 25 factors in 2022, Rafael Nadal considerably narrowed the hole with Feder and even Djokovic. The highest three stand at 24 factors. If Roger Federer continues to be within the lead, it’s largely as a result of he’s the oldest of the three. But when Djokovic and Nadal prolong their careers by even two or three years, it’s probably that the duo will overtake the Swiss icon, the chief of this rating since their closing on the US Open in 2009, towards Juan Martin Del Potro 13 years in the past. .

Rafael Nadal, the document holder of the Grand Slam titles (22), towards Djokovic and Federer at 21 and 20, continues to be overtaken by two different trendy tennis monsters, particularly attributable to much less regularity and a profession showered with way more repetition. accidents than his two rivals.

Lastly, be aware that Andy Murray climbed to fifteenth place from the Australian Open. Image of the Briton’s distinctive consistency in main tournaments: in our High 20, he’s the one one to carry lower than six Grand Slam titles. He gained “solely” three. However he has appeared thirty-eight occasions within the second week, together with eight finals along with his three crowns. The scariest? Murray has missed the 1/8 finals in over 5 years (Wimbledon 2017), after bodily setbacks started. With out it, he may get everybody proper as much as Jimmy Connors. The “Massive Three” would then be the “Massive 4” in our rating.

Andy Murray

Supply: Getty Photographs

Rating after the US Open 2022

1. Roger Federer – 359 factors
2. Novak Djokovic – 345 factors
3. Rafael Nadal – 325 factors
4. Jimmy Connors – 208 factors
5. Pete Sampras – 203 factors
6. Ivan Lendl – 202 factors
7. Roy Emerson – 201 factors
8. Andre Agassi – 192 factors
9. Ken Rosewall – 179 factors
10. Rod Laver – 162 factors

11. Björn Borg – 156 factors
12. Invoice Tilden – 152 factors
13. John McEnroe – 149 factors
14. John Newcombe – 144 factors
15. Andy Murray – 144 factors
16. Stefan Edberg – 143 factors
17. Jack Crawford – 137 factors
18. Boris Becker – 134 factors
19. Mats Wilander – 124 factors
20. Henri Cochet – 117 factors

In fact, it is not about prioritizing one of the best gamers ever, however reasonably figuring out sturdy tendencies. The restrictions of this classification are after all as a result of vagaries of tennis itself over the many years.

In the identical means that the variety of Grand Slam titles is an unsatisfactory comparative aspect for greats who spent all or most of their careers earlier than the appearance of the Open period. Since (virtually) everybody has turned skilled, the large gamers who gained earlier than 1968 are working wanting main tournaments. What number of titles would Rod Laver have, for instance, if he had not gained 21 consecutive majors in 1963-1968?

Rod Laver and Ken Rosewall.

Supply: Getty Photographs

What about Ken Rosewall? At 22, he turned skilled. When he performed the Grand Slam once more in 1968, he was quickly 34 years outdated. Check out the information of Federer, Djokovic, Connors and Sampras and take away all their most vital titles gained between the ages of twenty-two and 34. What’s left? Nothing, not a lot at greatest. Rosewall gained the ‘French Professional’ 8 occasions (contested yearly on clay in Paris, which was the Roland-Garros equal for execs) between 1958 and 1966, notably beating Laver 4 occasions within the closing.

The Australian additionally gained Wembley Professional 5 occasions and US Professional twice. That is a complete of 15 titles in what might be known as a “skilled Grand Slam”. So if Rosewall has “solely” 8 official Grand Slam titles, he would most likely be approaching Federer’s document. Barely. Regardless of these lengthy parentheses, Rosewall and Laver are ninth and tenth in our rating. I imply… However no matter occurs, and with out the slightest shock, Federer, Djokovic and Nadal are within the means of leaving a singular and fully authentic imprint.

Djokovic, Federer, Nadal

Supply: Eurosport


“Federer introduced tennis to the living room of people who did not watch it”



Roger Federer: 20 Moments That Shaped the Giant’s Legend


Leave a Comment